Year 2024 / Volume 31 / Number 1

Original

Psychosocial risk in people with nonspecific chronic low back pain. An analytical cross-sectional study

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2024; 31(1): 16-22 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2024.3996/2022

Fernando Imaz, Mauro Barone, José Luis Aguirre, Iván Cuyul, Leonardo Intelangelo


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the association between psychosocial risk, fear-avoidance beliefs and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP).
Patients and methods: Cross-sectional analytical study. Patients between 18 and 70 years old with DLCI greater than six months were recruited. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires in the first session. The dependent variable was psychosocial risk and was assessed with the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST). Disability, fear-avoidance beliefs about work and physical activity were the explanatory variables. A binomial logistic regression model with the forward method was used to obtain an adjusted estimate of the probability of psychosocial risk.
Results: 85 patients with DLCI (age = 42 ± 11; 53 % women) were included. The prevalence rates of high, medium, and low risk according to SBST were 16.47 %, 45.88 % and 37.64 %, respectively. The results of the logistic regression model indicated that there is a positive association between fear-avoidance beliefs associated with work and disability. Odds ratios indicated that the greater the disability (OR = 1.21; 95 % CI = 1.00-1.47) and fear-avoidance beliefs associated with work (OR = 1.13; 95 % CI = 1.06-1.20), the greater the probability of psychosocial risk.
Conclusions: The presence of psychosocial risk in patients with DLCI was positively associated with fear-avoidance beliefs about work and disability. More evidence is needed before the findings can be translated into physical therapy settings.



RESUMEN

Objetivo: Determinar la asociación entre el riesgo psicosocial, las creencias miedo-evitación y la discapacidad en pacientes con dolor lumbar crónico inespecífico (DLCI).
Pacientes y métodos: Estudio transversal observacional analítico. Se reclutaron a pacientes entre 18 y 70 años con DLCI mayor a seis meses. La recolección de datos se realizó mediante cuestionarios en una única sesión. La variable dependiente fue el riesgo psicosocial y se evaluó con la STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST). La discapacidad, las creencias miedo-evitación al trabajo y a la actividad física fueron las variables explicativas. Se utilizó un modelo de regresión logística binomial con el método hacia delante para obtener una estimación ajustada de la probabilidad de riesgo psicosocial.
Resultados: Fueron incluidos 85 pacientes con DLCI (edad = 42 ± 11; 53 % mujeres). Las tasas de prevalencia de riesgo alto, medio y bajo riesgo según SBST fue de 16.47 %, 45.88 % y 37.64 %, respectivamente. Los resultados del modelo de regresión logística indicaron que existe una asociación positiva entre las creencias miedoevitación asociadas al trabajo y la discapacidad. Las razones de Odds indicaron que a mayor discapacidad (OR = 1.21; IC 95 % = 1.00-1.47) y creencias miedo-evitación asociadas al trabajo (OR = 1.13; IC 95 % = 1.06-1.20) la probabilidad de riesgo psicosocial es mayor.
Conclusiones: La presencia de riesgo psicosocial en pacientes con DLCI estuvo positivamente asociada con las creencias miedo-evitación con el trabajo y discapacidad. Se necesitan más pruebas antes de que los hallazgos puedan trasladarse a los entornos de fisioterapia.





Complete Article

Nuevo comentario

Security code:
CAPTCHA code image
Speak the codeChange the code
 

Comentarios

No comments in this article

Bibliografía

1. Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abate KH, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211-59.
2. Beyera GK, O’Brien J, Campbell S. Health-care utilisation for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based observational studies. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39(10):1663-79.
3. Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006-17.
4. Ikemoto T, Miki K, Matsubara T, Wakao N. Psychological treatment strategy for chronic low back pain. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3(3):199-206.
5. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356-67.
6. Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Thomas E, Silman AJ, Macfarlane GJ. Psychosocial risks for low back pain: Are these related to work?. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59(4):319-20.
7. Hush JM. Low back pain: it is time to embrace complexity. Pain. 2020;161(10):2248-51.
8. Foster NE, Thomas E, Bishop A, Dunn KM, Main CJ. Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care. Pain. 2012;148(3):398-406.
9. Hill JC, Whitehurst DGT, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560-71.
10. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Main CJ, Hay EM. Subgrouping low back pain: A comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(1):83-9.
11. Gusi N, Del Pozo-Cruz B, Olivares PR, Hernández-Mocholi M, Hill JC. The Spanish version of the “sTarT back screening tool” (SBST) in different subgroups. Aten Primaria. 2011;43(7):356-61.
12. Pilz B, Vasconcelos RA, Teixeira PP, Mello W, Marcondes FB, Hill JC, et al. Construct and discriminant validity of STarT Back Screening Tool – Brazilian version. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(1):69-73.
13. Pilz B, Vasconcelos RA, Marcondes FB, Lodovichi SS, Mello W, Grossi DB. The Brazilian version of start back screening tool - translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(5):453-61.
14. Haskins R, Rivett DA, Osmotherly PG. Clinical prediction rules in the physiotherapy management of low back pain: A systematic review. Man Ther. 2012;17(1):9-21.
15. Cuyul Vásquez IA, Araya Quintanilla F. Influence of psychosocial factors on the experience of musculoskeletal pain: a literature review. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2018;26(1):43-50. DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3679/2018.
16. Trinderup JS, Fisker A, Juhl CB, Petersen T. Fear avoidance beliefs as a predictor for long-term sick leave, disability and pain in patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):431.
17. Kroska EB. A meta-analysis of fear-avoidance and pain intensity: The paradox of chronic pain. Scand J Pain. 2016;13:43-58.
18. Rainville J, Smeets RJ, Bendix T, Tveito TH, Poiraudeau S, Indahl AJ. Fear-avoidance beliefs and pain avoidance in low back pain--translating research into clinical practice. Spine J. 2011;11(9):895-903.
19. Hill JC, Whitehurst DGT, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560-71.
20. Hill JC, Fritz JM. Psychosocial influences on low back pain, disability, and response to treatment. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):712-21.
21. Kovacs FM, Muriel A, Medina JM, Abraira V, Castillo Sánchez MD, Jaúregui JO, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the FAB questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(1):104-10.
22. Nava-Bringas TI, Macías-Hernández SI, Vásquez-Ríos JR, Coronado-Zarco R, Miranda-Duarte A, Cruz-Medina E, et al. Fear-avoidance beliefs increase perception of pain and disability in Mexicans with chronic low back pain. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2017;57(4):306-10.
23. Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Gil Del Real MT, Abraira V, Gestoso M, Fernández C, Primaria Group KA. Validation of the spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(5):538-42.
24. Wertli MM, Rasmussen-Barr E, Weiser S, Bachmann LM, Brunner F. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review. Spine J. 2014;14(5):816-836.e4.
25. Du S, Hu L, Bai Y, Dong J, Jin S, Zhang H, et al. The Influence of Self-Efficacy, Fear-Avoidance Belief, and Coping Styles on Quality of Life for Chinese Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study. Pain Pract. 2018;18(6):736-47.
26. Lundberg M, Frennered K, Hägg O, Styf J. The impact of fear-avoidance model variables on disability in patients with specific or nonspecific chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2011;36(19):1547-53.
27. Panhale V, Gurav R, Nahar S. Association of physical performance and fear-avoidance beliefs in adults with chronic low back pain. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2016;6(6):375.
28. Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Fritz JM, Robinson ME, Asal NR, Nisenzon AN, et al. The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: Evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings. Phys Ther. 2013;93(3):321-33.
29. Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368-83.
30. Otero-Ketterer E, Peñacoba-Puente C, Ortega-Santiago R, Galán-Del-Río F, Valera-Calero JA. Consideration of Psychosocial Factors in Acute Low Back Pain by Physical Therapists. J Clin Med. 2023;12(11):3865.
31. Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85(3):317-32.
32. Rainville J, Smeets RJEM, Bendix T, Tveito TH, Poiraudeau S, Indahl AJ. Fear-avoidance beliefs and pain avoidance in low back pain--translating research into clinical practice. Spine J. 2011;11(9):895-903.

Artículos relacionados

Exosomes as a potential therapeutic strategy for low back pain: literature review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(4): 243-249 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4075/2023

Ultrasound-guided ankle nerve block as adjuvant therapy in chronic pain after occupational injury.

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(3): 178-186 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4035/2022

Effect of therapeutic exercise in persons with sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(2): 95-108 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4034/2022

Not just low back pain: atypical manifestation of aortic aneurysm

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(1): 60-62 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3983/2022

Effectiveness of cluneal nerve block for the treatment of chronic low back pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(1): 30-35 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4023/2022

Usefulness of percutaneous basivertebral nerve thermorizotomy for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Literature review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(3): 169-174 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.4044/2022

Psychological intervention program to promoted active coping in patients with chronic back pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(3): 149-156 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3993/2022

Cross-sectional study on factors related to chronic pain and its care, according to sex

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(2): 61-70 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3968/2022

Use of 8 % capsaicin patches for the treatment of lumbar neuropathic pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(1): 28-33 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3995/2022

Evolution of low back pain in cancer patients treated with interventional pain management

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(2): 76-81 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3901/2021

Epidemiology, clinical impact and therapeutic objectives in osteoarthritis

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(13): 4-10 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3874/2020

Considerations for clinical examination of nonspecific neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(5): 316-323 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3834/2020

Therapeutic failure of the lumbar medial branch block and its relation to obesity. Retrospective cohort study

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(5): 298-305 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3829/2020

Identification of signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of discogenic low back pain: mapping review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(5): 292-297 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3803/2020

Sociodemographic and clinical characterization in patients with chronic back pain, Cienfuegos 2019

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(4): 239-245 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3798/2020

Review of the impact of acupuncture treatment on the management of nonspecific low back pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(1): 53-58 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3762/2019

New ACP guidelines for non-radicular low back pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(4): 254-254 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3590/2017

Pain in Parkinson's disease. A look at a little known aspect of this pathology

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(3): 184-198 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2019.3733/2019

Influence of psychosocial factors in the experience of musculoskeletal pain: a literatura review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(1): 44-51 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3679/2018

Psychosocial factors in chronic cancer pain: a Delphi study

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(1): 21-30 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3658/2018

Prevalence of breakthrough pain associated with chronic low back pain in Andalusia (COLUMBUS study)

Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2017; 24(3):116-124 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3548/2016

Instrucciones para citar

Imaz F, Barone M, Aguirre J, Cuyul I, Intelangelo L. Psychosocial risk in people with nonspecific chronic low back pain. An analytical cross-sectional study. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2024; 31(1): 16-22 / DOI: 1020986/resed20243996/2022


Descargar a un gestores de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica

Este artículo ha sido visitado 9 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 0 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 01/06/2022

Aceptado: 28/04/2024

Prepublicado: 09/12/2024

Publicado: 22/01/2025

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 504 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 922 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 966 días


Compartir

Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Reader rating:
Rate this article:
© 2025 Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor
ISSN: 1134-8046   e-ISSN: 2254-6189

      Indexada en: