ISSN: 1134-8046
e-ISSN: 2254-6189

Indexada en:

Busqueda avanzada

Year 2021 / Volume 28 / Number 1

Abstract PDF

HTML

Original

Implementation and evaluation of a multimodal analgesia protocol for total knee arthroplasty including ultrasoundguided adductor canal block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(1): 9-18 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3847/2020

Laura Marcela Zamudio, Juan Fernando González, Javier Ricardo Rodríguez, Fabián Camilo Dorado

ABSTRACT

Background: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is a safe and effective technique in postoperative pain management. This study evaluates the implementation an analgesic protocol for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) including different nerve blocks.
Methods: An observational ambispective non randomized cohort study was performed between a group of patients undergoing TKA who received local infiltration analgesia plus adductor canal block (LIA+ACB) as part of a new analgesic protocol against a previous group who received perineural femoral catheter plus sciatic nerve block (PFC+SNB). The measurement of pain intensity was made using the numerical rating scale (NRS). The main outcome was the immediate postoperative pain, at 24 and 48 hours. The fulfillment of physical rehabilitation goals was evaluated as a secondary outcome.
Results: 112 patients were analyzed (67 in LIA+ACB and 45 in PFC+SNB). Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. The median pain at rest on the first and second postoperative days was NRS 2/10 for both groups. The average pain on movement on the second postoperative day was NRS 5/10 for patients with LIA+ACB and 4/10 for patients with PFC+SNB, p=0,073. The percentage of patients who fulfilled ≥80% of the rehabilitation goals was similar in
both groups (p=0,201).
Conclusions: In the TKA postoperative analgesic management, both techniques are equivalent during the first 48 hours. Although it is known that the LIA+ACB technique generates less motor impairment of the quadriceps muscle, this was not reflected on better performance during physical rehabilitation, possibly due to insufficient analgesic control at 48 hours.

RESUMEN

Introducción: La anestesia regional guiada por ultrasonografía es una técnica segura y efectiva para el manejo del dolor postoperatorio. Este estudio evalúa la implementación de un protocolo analgésico para el reemplazo total primario de rodilla (RTPR).
Métodos: Estudio observacional ambispectivo de cohortes no aleatorizado, realizado en un grupo de pacientes llevados a RTPR que recibieron infiltración de anestésico local periarticular más bloqueo del canal de aductores (IAL+BCA) como parte de un nuevo protocolo analgésico, frente a un grupo previo que recibió catéter perineural femoral más bloqueo del nervio ciático (CPF+BNC). La valoración de la intensidad del dolor se realizó utilizando la escala verbal numérica (EVN). El desenlace principal fue el dolor postoperatorio inmediato a las 24 y 48 horas. Se evaluó el cumplimiento de metas de rehabilitación física a las 48 horas como desenlace secundario.
Resultados: Se analizaron 112 pacientes (67 en IAL + BCA y 45 en CPF + BNC). Ambas poblaciones fueron comparables en variables demográficas. La mediana del dolor en reposo en el primer y segundo día postoperatorios fue EVN 2/10 para ambos grupos. El promedio del dolor en movimiento en el segundo día postoperatorio fue EVN 5/10 para los pacientes con IAL + BCA y 4/10 para los pacientes con CPF + BNC, p = 0,073. El porcentaje de pacientes que cumplieron el 80 % o más de las metas de rehabilitación fue similar en ambos grupos (p = 0,201).
Conclusiones: Ambas técnicas son equivalentes en el manejo analgésico postoperatorio del RTPR durante las primeras 48 horas. A pesar de que es conocido que la técnica de IAL + BCA genera menos compromiso motor del cuádriceps, esto no se reflejó en un mejor desempeño durante la rehabilitación física, posiblemente por un insuficiente control analgésico a las 48 horas.

Complete Article

Nuevo comentario

Security code:

Comentarios

No comments in this article

Bibliografía

1. Thomsen MG, Husted H, Otte KS, Orsnes T, Troelsen A. Indications for knee arthroplasty have remained consistent over time. Dan Med J. 2012;59(8):A4492.

2. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012; 379(9823):1331-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6

3. Inacio MCS, Paxton EW, Graves SE, Namba RS, Nemes S. Projected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States–an alternative projection model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017;25(11):1797-803. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.022

4. Kumar L, Kumar AH, Grant SA, Gadsden J. Updates in enhanced recovery pathways for total knee arthroplasty. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018;36:375-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.04.007.

DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.04.007

5. Buvanendran A, Della Valle CJ, Kroin JS, Shah M, Moric M, Tuman KJ, et al. Acute postoperative pain is an independent predictor of chronic postsurgical pain following total knee arthroplasty at 6 months: a prospective cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:e100036. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100036.

DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100036

6. Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(4):934-44. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.

DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3

7. Elmallah RK, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Newman JM, Stearns KL, Roche M, et al. Pain control in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(6):504-13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604152.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604152

8. Wheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events associated with postoperative opioid analgesia: a systematic review. J Pain. 2002;3(3):159-80. DOI: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652.

DOI: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652

9. Terkawi AS, Mavridis D, Sessler DI, Nunemaker MS, Doais KS, Terkawi RS, et al. Pain management modalities after total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of 170 randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(5):923-37. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001607.

DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001607

10. Dorado-Velasco FC, Satizábal-Padridín N. Efficacy of different multimodal analgesia techniques to prevent moderate to severe pain in primary total knee arthroplasty. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2018;46:8-16. DOI: 10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000039.

DOI: 10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000039

11. Sharma S, Iorio R, Specht LM, Davies-Lepie S, Healy WL. Complications of femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):135-40. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1025-1.

DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1025-1

12. Wasserstein D, Farlinger C, Brull R, Mahomed N, Gandhi R. Advanced age, obesity and continuous femoral nerve blockade are independent risk factors for inpatient falls after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(7):1121-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.018

13. Rojas NE, Gómez RJ, Hamaji A, Hamaji MW, Vieira JE. Continuous femoral nerve blockade and single-shot sciatic nerve block promotes better analgesia and lower bleeding for total knee arthroplasty compared to intrathecal morphine: a randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:64. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0355-x.

DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0355-x

14. Abdallah FW, Brull R. Is sciatic nerve block advantageous when combined with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(5):493-8. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318228d5d4.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318228d5d4

15. Grape S, Kirkham KR, Baeriswyl M, Albrecht E. The analgesic efficacy of sciatic nerve block in addition to femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2016;71(10):1198-209. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13568.

DOI: 10.1111/anae.13568

16. Ilfeld BM, Madison SJ. The sciatic nerve and knee arthroplasty: to block, or not to block--that is the question. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(5):421-3. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31822940d2.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31822940d2

17. Burckett-St Laurant D, Peng P, Girón Arango L, Niazi AU, Chan VW, Agur A, et al. The Nerves of the Adductor Canal and the Innervation of the Knee: An Anatomic Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(3):321-7. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000389.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000389

18. Anagnostopoulou S, Anagnostis G, Saranteas T, Mavrogenis AF, Paraskeuopoulos T. Saphenous and Infrapatellar Nerves at the Adductor Canal: Anatomy and Implications in Regional Anesthesia. Orthopedics. 2016;39(2):e259-62. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160129-03.

DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160129-03

19. Tran J, Peng PWH, Lam K, Baig E, Agur AM, Gofeld M. Anatomical Study of the Innervation of Anterior Knee Joint Capsule: Implication for Image-Guided Intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(4):407-14. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000778.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000778

20. Macrinici GI, Murphy C, Christman L, Drescher M, Hughes B, Macrinici V, et al. Prospective, double-blind, randomized study to evaluate single-injection adductor canal nerve block versus femoral nerve block: postoperative functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):10-6. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000507.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000507

21. Amundson AW, Johnson RL, Abdel MP, Mantilla CB, Panchamia JK, Taunton MJ, et al. A three-arm randomized clinical trial comparing continuous femoral plus single-injection sciatic peripheral nerve blocks versus periarticular injection with ropivacaine or liposomal bupivacaine for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(6):1139-50. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001586.

DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001586

22. Guild GN 3rd, Galindo RP, Marino J, Cushner FD, Scuderi GR. Periarticular regional analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the neuroanatomy and injection technique. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2014.09.016.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2014.09.016

23. Ellis TA 2nd, Hammoud H, Dela Merced P, Nooli NP, Ghoddoussi F, Kong J, et al. Multimodal clinical pathway with adductor canal block decreases hospital length of stay, improves pain control, and reduces opioid consumption in total knee arthroplasty patients: a retrospective review. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(8):2440-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.053.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.053

24. Drew JM, Neilio J, Kunze L. Contemporary perioperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: multimodal protocols, regional anesthesia, and peripheral nerve blockade. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(7):600-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636835.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636835

25. Wang D, Yang Y, Li Q, Tang SL, Zeng WN, Xu J, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40721. DOI: 10.1038/srep40721.

DOI: 10.1038/srep40721

26. Perlas A, Kirkham KR, Billing R, Tse C, Brull R, Gandhi R, et al. The impact of analgesic modality on early ambulation following total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(4):334-9. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318296b6a0.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318296b6a0

27. Ma J, Gao F, Sun W, Guo W, Li Z, Wang W. Combined adductor canal block with periarticular infiltration versus periarticular infiltration for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(52):e5701.

DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005701

28. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.0800063.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.0800063

29. Ludwigson JL, Tillmans SD, Galgon RE, Chambers TA, Heiner JP, Schroeder KM. A Comparison of single shot adductor canal block versus femoral nerve catheter for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(9):68-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.044.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.044

30. Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2215-2225. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60245-6.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60245-6

31. Sørensen JK, Jæger P, Dahl JB, Gottschau B, Stephensen SL, Grevstad U. The isolated effect of adductor canal block on quadriceps femoris muscle strength after total knee arthroplasty: a triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with individual patient analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(2):553-8. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001073.

DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001073

32. Gao F, Ma J, Sun W, Guo W, Li Z, Wang W. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(4):356-68. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000402.

DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000402

33. Tan Z, Kang P, Pei F, Shen B, Zhou Z, Yang J. A comparison of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block after total-knee arthroplasty regarding analgesic effect, effectiveness of early rehabilitation, and lateral knee pain relief in the early stage. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(48):e13391. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013391.

DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013391

34. Macrinici GI, Murphy C, Christman L, Drescher M, Hughes B, Macrinici V, et al. Prospective, double-blind, randomized study to evaluate single-injection adductor canal nerve block versus femoral nerve block: postoperative functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):10-6. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000507.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000507

35. Elkassabany NM, Cai LF, Badiola I, Kase B, Liu J, Hughes C, et al. A prospective randomized open-label study of single injection versus continuous adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(3):340-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B3.BJJ-2018-0852.R2.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B3.BJJ-2018-0852.R2

36. Machi AT, Sztain JF, Kormylo NJ, Madison SJ, Abramson WB, Monahan AM, et al. Discharge readiness after tricompartment knee arthroplasty, adductor canal versus femoral continuous nerve blocks-a dual-center, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(2):444-56. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000741.

DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000741

37. Sites BD, Chan VW, Neal JM, Weller R, Grau T, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, et al. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society Of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(1):40-6. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181926779.

DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181926779

38. Cheung CW, Ching Wong SS, Qiu Q, Wang X. Oral Oxycodone for Acute Postoperative Pain: A Review of Clinical Trials. Pain Physician. 2017;20(2S):SE33-SE52.

DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2017.sE52

39. Buvanendran A, Kroin J, Della Valle CJ, Kari M, Moric M, Tuman KJ. Perioperative Oral Pregabalin Reduces Chronic. Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(1):199-207. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c4273a.

DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c4273a

40. Wang ZY, Shi SY, Li SJ, Chen F, Chen H, Lin HZ, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine on Osteoarthritis Knee Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Med. 2015;16(7):1373-85. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12800.

DOI: 10.1111/pme.12800

41. Arendt-Nielsen L, Nie H, Laursen MB, Laursen BS, Madeleine P, Simonsen OH, et al. Sensitization in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis. Pain. 2010;149(3):573-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.003.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.003

42. Hina N, Fletcher D, Poindessous-Jazat F, Martinez V. Hyperalgesia induced by low-dose opioid treatment before orthopaedic surgery: An observational case-control study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(4):255-61.

DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000197

Instrucciones para citar

Zamudio L, González J, Rodríguez J, Dorado F. Implementation and evaluation of a multimodal analgesia protocol for total knee arthroplasty including ultrasoundguided adductor canal block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2021; 28(1): 9-18 / DOI: 1020986/resed20213847/2020

Descargar a un gestores de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica

Este artículo ha sido visitado 35515 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 7 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions

Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 23/09/2020

Aceptado: 14/02/2021

Prepublicado: 26/02/2021

Publicado: 17/03/2021

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 106 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 156 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 175 días

Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.

Reader rating:

Rate this article:

Send by e-mail

Gestión de Cookies	Nombre	Tipo de Cookie	Función
Google	NID, PREF	Persistente	Personalizar los anuncios que se muestran en los servicios de Google.
Google Analytics	__utma, __utmb, __utmc, __utmz	Persistente	Conocer de forma anónima, nº de visitantes, procedencia, páginas visitadas, etc.