Keywords
low back pain
discogenic pain.
Abstract
Objective: Low back pain is one of the most common pathologies in adult population. Its economic burden to the health system and its impact on quality of life and function, makes it a relevant theme. In most of the cases the etiology of pain can be delimitated but a diagnostic scale for discogenic low back pain (DLBP) is not available. Reviewing the most frequent signs and symptoms of DLBP in literature may improve the approach to the patient with pain. Additionally, it may aid the creation of a pilot diagnostic scale for DLBP. Materials and methods: A systematic review of literature was done over the last 20 years in MEDLINE and BIREME. A mapping review of the most frequent symptoms and signs (clinical and imaging) used to suspect DLBP was conducted. A total of 1010 articles were reviewed, 103 of which were selected to analyze the frequency of reporting signs and symptoms included in the diagnosis. Results: In the mapping review, the most frequent symptom was axial low back pain, followed by the absence of radicular pain. A lower frequency of description was observed in the literature regarding the signs associated with disc pain, finding mention only in 12 % of the articles of biphasic movements when passing from sitting to standing. The centralization of pain to the physical examination, a positive vibration test and the absence of improvement with facet and sacroiliac infiltration, were other signs found in the review. As for the diagnostic images, the Pfirrmann scale had the highest frequency of appearance, followed by the HIZ (High intensity zone) and Modic changes. Conclusions: Low back pain is a complex pathology in its treatment and its consequences in the lives of patients. Diagnosing DLD can improve how we manage patients. Symptoms and clinical and radiological signs have a greater diagnostic impact when used together. The characteristics with the highest frequency of appearance in the literature were selected to generate a pilot scale, which should be compared to the gold standard in DLD, discography.References
1. Ganesan S, Acharya A, Chauhan R, Acharya S. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Low Back Pain in 1,355 Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Asian Spine J. 2017;11(4):610-7. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.610.
2. World Health Organization. Priority diseases and reasons for inclusion [Internet]. WHO; 2013. Available in: https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/Ch6_24LBP.pdf.
3. Ramdas J, Jella V. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain. Int J Adv Med. 2019;5(5):1120-3. DOI: 10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20183413.
4. Benzel E, Francis T. Spine surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012. p. 119-23.
5. Benzel E, Francis T. Spine surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012. p.165-75.
6. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P. 'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2019;78(6):965-72. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x78b6.1287.
7. Yu Y, Liu W, Song D, Guo Q, Jia L. Diagnosis of discogenic low back pain in patients with probable symptoms but negative discography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(5):627-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1448-5.
8. Yang G, Liao W, Shen M, Mei H. Insight into neural mechanisms underlying discogenic back pain. J Intl Med Res. 2018;46(11):4427-36. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518799902.
9. Maus T, Aprill C. Lumbar diskogenic pain, provocation diskography, and imaging correlates. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012;50(4):681-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.013.
10. Carragee E, Lincoln T, Parmar V, Alamin T. A Gold Standard Evaluation of the “Discogenic Pain” Diagnosis as Determined by Provocative Discography. Spine. 2006;31(18):2115-23. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231436.30262.dd.
11. Prithvi Raj P. Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain. 2008;8(1):18-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00171.x.
12. Manchikanti L, Hirsch J. An update on the management of chronic lumbar discogenic pain. Pain Management. 2015;5(5):373-86. DOI: 10.2217/pmt.15.33.
13. Huddleston P. 2009 ISSLS Prize Winner: Does Discography Cause Accelerated Progression of Degeneration Changes in the Lumbar Disc: A Ten-Year Matched Cohort Study. Yearbook Of Orthopedics. 2010;2010:262-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0276-1092(10)79682-6.
14. Allegri M, Montella S, Salici F, Valente A, Marchesini M, Compagnone C, Baciarello M, et al. Mechanisms of low back pain: a guide for diagnosis and therapy. F1000Research. 2016;5:1530. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8105.1.
15. Hancock M, Maher C, Latimer J, Spindler M, McAuley J, Laslett M, et al. Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(10):1539-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0391-1.
16. Navone S, Marfia G, Canzi L, Ciusani E, Canazza A, Visintini S, et al. Expression of neural and neurotrophic markers in nucleus pulposus cells isolated from degenerated intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(9):1470-7. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22098.
17. Berthelot J, Delecrin J, Maugars Y, Passuti N. Contribution of centralization phenomenon to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diskogenic low back pain. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74(4):319-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.12.002.
18. Zhang Y, Guo T, Guo X, Wu S. Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain. Int J Biol Sci. 2009;5(7):647-58. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.5.647.
19. Herlin C, Kjaer P, Espeland A, Skouen JS, Leboeuf-Y de C, Karppinen J, et al. Modic changes-Their associations with low back pain and activity limitation: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2018;13(8):e0200677. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200677.
20. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology. 1988;168(1):177-86. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.168.1.3289089.