Year 2018 / Volume 25 / Number 6

Abstract PDF

Original

Opinaudit study: clinical uses in breakthrough pain, is scientific evidence being followed up?

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2018; 25(6): 325-334 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3634/2017

Javier Carceller Ruiz, Jordi Guitart Vela, Diana Monge Martín, Fernando Caballero Martínez


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a common health problem, badly known and poorly treated in spite of the advancement in its treatment. Guidelines have been published recently by Scientific Societies involved in their management in order to improve the diagnosis and treatment.
Objectives: To know the degree of knowledge and professional agreement with Scientific Societies recommendations, the auto perception in the follow-up and the real follow-up by doctors in their outpatient clinics.
Materials and methods: A descriptive study from professionals’ opinions that were recorded in an electronic survey at two sequential times. A self-audit of clinical habits was performed between them. Professionals evaluated the level of agreement and the application of 12 recommendations from the guidelines in five patients with BPT in their outpatient clinics.
Results: A total of 202 doctors from breakthrough pain units and palliative care participated in the study, at a national level; the mean of professional experience was 11.9 years. Mean age was 47.9 years and 45 % were women. Recommendations’ document was known by 86.6 %. Recommendations with lower degree of agreement or considered less followed-up by professionals were: 1. Recommendation related to the patient’s follow-up during medication titration process: 78.7 % and 18.3 % of surveyed were totally or partially agree with it while 59.4
% always applied it. 2. Recommendation related to prevention of opioid side effects from the beginning of the treatment: 56.4 % and 18.8 % of surveyed were totally or partially agree with it while 66.3 % always applied it. 3. Recommendation related to the need of the patient of receiving opioids for baseline pain: 76.7 % and 35.6 % of surveyed were totally or partially agree with it while 66.8 % always applied it.
After clinical records self-audit, recommendations regarding patients’ follow-up and prevention of side effects were not applied between 15 and 20 % of the times, in line to previous perceptions from specialists. However, recommendation related to the use of opioids for baseline pain isclosed a lower breach (7 %) than perceived (33.2 %).
Conclusions: Professionals from Pain Units and Palliative Care Units have a realistic and accurate perception of the quality of their job in patients with breakthrough pain as well as the improvement areas in their daily job regarding the follow-up and application of recommendations based in scientific evidence.



RESUMEN

Introducción: El dolor irruptivo oncológico (DIO) es un problema de salud frecuente, mal conocido e incorrectamente tratado a pesar de los avances en su tratamiento. Las sociedades científicas implicadas en su manejo han publicado recientemente recomendaciones para la optimización de su diagnóstico y tratamiento.
Objetivos: Conocer el grado de conocimiento y de acuerdo de los profesionales con las recomendaciones de las sociedades científicas, la autopercepción del seguimiento de las mismas por los médicos y su seguimiento real en la clínica.
Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de las opiniones de los profesionales recogidas en un cuestionario electrónico en dos momentos secuenciales entre los que intermedió una autovaloración (self-audit) de hábitos clínicos. Los profesionales evaluaron el grado de acuerdo y la aplicación de 12 recomendaciones de las guías en cinco pacientes con DIO en seguimiento en consulta.
Resultados: En el estudio participaron 202 médicos de unidades del dolor y cuidados paliativos de ámbito nacional con una media de 11,9 años de experiencia laboral. La edad media fue 47,9 años y el 45 % fueron mujeres. El 86,6 % conocía el documento de recomendaciones.
Las recomendaciones que alcanzaban menor grado de acuerdo o se percibían como menos aplicadas por los profesionales fueron: 1. La recomendación relacionada con el seguimiento del paciente durante la titulación del tratamiento: el 78,7 % y el 18,3 % de los encuestados mostraron un acuerdo pleno o parcial con la misma y el 59,4 % la aplicaba casi siempre. 2. La recomendación sobre la prevención de efectos secundarios del tratamiento con opioides desde el inicio: el 76,7 % y el 18,8 % mostraron acuerdo pleno o parcial, el 66,3 % la aplicaba casi siempre. 3. La recomendación sobre la necesidad de que el paciente esté recibiendo opioides para el tratamiento del dolor basal: el 56,4 % y el 35,6 % mostraron acuerdo pleno o parcial, el 66,8 % la aplicaba casi siempre.
Tras el self-audit de historias clínicas, las recomendaciones sobre el seguimiento de los pacientes y la prevención de efectos secundarios no se aplicaban en el 15 y 20 % de las ocasiones, en línea con las percepciones previas de los especialistas. Sin embargo, la recomendación sobre la utilización previa de opioides para el dolor basal reveló un incumplimiento menor (7 %) al percibido (33,2 %).
Conclusiones: Los profesionales de Unidades del Dolor y de Unidades de Cuidados Paliativos tienen una percepción realista y precisa de la calidad de su trabajo en los pacientes con dolor irruptivo, así como de los aspectos mejorables de su práctica clínica diaria en relación con el seguimiento y la aplicación de las recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia científica.


Nuevo comentario

Security code:
CAPTCHA code image
Speak the codeChange the code
 

Comentarios

No comments in this article

Artículos relacionados

Continuous electrical stimulation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. A systematic review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(4): 217-226 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4043/2022

Observational, prospective and multicenter study on the use of transmucosal fentanyl citrate in regular clinical practice for the control of breakthrough pain crises in cancer patients

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(2): 72-78 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4028/2022

Attitudes and current knowledge of the spanish pain treatment specialist regarding medical cannabis

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(13): 52-57 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.4032/2022

Cannabinoids in neuropathic pain: lights and shadows

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(13): 20-26 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.4027/2022

Recommendations for the safe prescription of opioids in patients with a history or risk of abuse

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(6): 343-349 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3935/2021

Clinical recommendations for rehabilitation of people with fibromyalgia. A narrative review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(4): 194-210 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3932/2021

Prescribing habits for neuropathic pain management in Spain: results of the survey of the neuropathic pain working group of the Spanish Pain Society

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(3): 137-147 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3911/2021

Postoperative ketamine efficacy in patients receiving chronic opioids undergoing spinal surgery

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(2): 92-99 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3825/2020

Risk of misuse of prescribed opioids in patients with chronic noncancer pain in a workers compensation system hospital in Chile

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(2): 82-91 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3845/2020

Management and perception of therapeutic adherence of breakthrough cancer pain by oncologists in Spain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(1): 19-26 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3824/2020

News in the clinical practice guidelines regarding the treatment of the hip, knee and hands osteoarthritis

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(13): 38-42 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3870/2020

Efficacy of lidocaine perfusions in fibromyalgia: a prospective cohort study

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(5): 287-291 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3796/2020

Gender determinants in the approach to chronic pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(4): 252-256 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3802/2020

Spanish Pain Society (SPS). Healthcare recommendations for pain units in the face of progressive normalization of activity during the COVID-19 pandemic

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(3): 192-215 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3821/2020

Symptomatic treatment for migraña. Drugs used and related variables. Results of the european survey on work and migraine

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(3): 178-191 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3744/2019

Management of breakthrough pain associated with the cure of skin ulcers

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(2): 113-126 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3755/2019

The medical doctors who perform their care and research work in pain units in the use of the internet: identification, characterization and determinants

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(5): 284-292 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2019.3713/2018

Characterization of pain in patients with breast cancer attending the Oncology Unit of the San José Hospital

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(4): 221-226 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2019.3692/2018

Information and communication technologies applied among medical professionals who perform pain treatment

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(3): 175-183 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2019.3709/2018

Explanations on the article “Recommendations based on evidence for the management of neuropathic pain (review of the literature)”

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(2): 134-137 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2019.3723/2019

Dexmedetomidine versus endovenous lidocaine in breakthrough pain control and functionality in patients with lumbar stenosis

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(1): 14-20 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3656/2018

Evidence-based recommendations for the management of neuropathic pain (review of the literature)

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2018; 25(6): 349-358 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3673/2018

Chrono study: prevalence of breakthrough pain among patients with non-cancer chronic pain in Andalusia, Spain

Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2018; 25(4): 214-221 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3626/2017

Pharmacological management of acute postoperative pain in Spain. Data from the national survey by the Spanish Pain Society (SED)

Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2018; 25(2): 70-85 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3593/2017

Pain management in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: GORVAMUR study, a prospective, observational, epidemiological study

Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2017; 24(5): 241-255 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3570/2017

Prevalence of breakthrough pain associated with chronic low back pain in Andalusia (COLUMBUS study)

Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2017; 24(3):116-124 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3548/2016

Factors associated with pain intensity in Mexican patients hospitalized in postoperative period

Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2017; 24(1): 4-10 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2016.3442/2016

Instrucciones para citar

Carceller Ruiz J, Guitart Vela J, Monge Martín D, Caballero Martínez F. Opinaudit study: clinical uses in breakthrough pain, is scientific evidence being followed up?. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2018; 25(6): 325-334 / DOI: 1020986/resed20183634/2017


Descargar a un gestores de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica

Este artículo ha sido visitado 55207 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 11 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 30/11/2017

Aceptado: 04/12/2017

Prepublicado: 08/01/2018

Publicado: 13/12/2018

Tiempo de prepublicación: 39 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 378 días


Compartir

Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Reader rating:
Rate this article:
Send by e-mail
© 2024 Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor
ISSN: 1134-8046   e-ISSN: 2254-6189

       Indexada en:
Política de Privacidad